Skip to main content


Quantum entanglement: what it is, how it works and what it's for

Pubblicato il 05/11/2026


Quantum entanglement is the most counterintuitive phenomenon of modern physics and, at the same time, the most valuable resource of quantum technologies, because without it there would be neither the computational advantage of the quantum computer, nor quantum key cryptography, nor the teleportation of states. In this guide we answer the most frequent questions, from the rigorous definition to how it is generated in the laboratory, from the famous debate with Einstein to Bell's theorem and the experiments awarded the 2022 Nobel Prize, up to the concrete applications and how to study the phenomenon in a quantum emulation environment, where every correlation can be inspected without destroying it. Reading requires no mathematical prerequisites, except in the section on Bell states, designed for those looking for the formalism.

What is quantum entanglement?

Quantum entanglement is a correlation between two or more systems that has no classical equivalent, because the overall state is precisely defined, while the states of the individual components, taken on their own, are not defined at all. Measuring one of the two systems instantly determines the correlated outcome on the other, regardless of the distance that separates them. This is not ordinary statistical correlation, like two gloves of the same pair sent to different cities, since entangled correlations violate mathematical constraints that any classical explanation would have to respect. The Wikipedia entry offers a historical overview that complements this guide. The term was coined by Erwin Schrödinger in 1935, who called it the characteristic trait of quantum mechanics, rather than one of its many aspects, and the entire discipline of quantum information has ended up proving him right.

How is an entangled particle pair created?

In the laboratory the techniques are by now routine. With photons, spontaneous parametric down-conversion is used, in which a nonlinear crystal converts a high-energy photon into a pair of photons correlated in polarisation. With trapped ions and superconducting circuits, entanglement is generated by making two qubits interact through a two-qubit gate, typically a CNOT preceded by a Hadamard. In quantum processors this is an elementary operation repeated millions of times, and the quality with which it is performed, the fidelity, is one of the metrics that separate a useful device from a demonstration experiment.

The Hadamard plus CNOT circuit

It is worth explaining what this combination of Hadamard and CNOT means in practice, because it is the most cited circuit in all of quantum information. The Hadamard gate, applied to a single qubit initialised to zero, takes it into an equal superposition of zero and one, so that the result of measuring it becomes unpredictable at fifty per cent. Applying a CNOT next, with that qubit as the control and a second qubit as the target, the value of the second qubit is flipped only in the cases where the first is one, and this binds the two qubits into a single shared superposition instead of leaving them independent. The result is one of the Bell states, in which the two qubits remain correlated whatever happens afterwards, even if they are physically separated. This is why the Hadamard plus CNOT pair has become the standard way, in every textbook and in every quantum programming framework, to build entanglement from independently initialised qubits.

Pair of entangled particles generated by a source: the measurement on one determines the correlated outcome on the other
A source generates two entangled particles, and the measurement outcomes remain correlated at any distance.

Does entanglement allow faster-than-light communication?

No, and the point deserves clarity because it is the most widespread misconception. The outcomes of the measurements on each system are individually random, so much so that whoever observes their own particle sees a sequence of unpredictable results, identical to a series of coin tosses. The correlation emerges only when the two observers compare their records, and that comparison requires a classical communication channel, bound by the speed of light. The no-communication theorem formalises this impossibility. Quantum entanglement is therefore a resource of correlation, not a transmission channel, a distinction that is essential for seriously assessing any technological proposal. The same constraint explains why newspaper headlines about instantaneous transmission are misleading, because what is distributed instantaneously is the correlation, not the message, and no protocol can circumvent the relativistic limit.

What are Bell states?

Bell states are the four maximally entangled states that can be formed with two qubits, and they represent the simplest and at the same time most instructive case of pure entanglement. None of them can be decomposed into the product of two independent single-qubit states, because the single qubit, taken on its own, contains no definite information, since all the information lives in the correlation between the two. They are also the concrete basis on which the main applications of entanglement are built, from quantum computing to cryptography and teleportation.

Bell state notation

In formal notation, the four Bell states are |Φ±⟩ = (|00⟩ ± |11⟩)/√2 and |Ψ±⟩ = (|01⟩ ± |10⟩)/√2. The reduced density matrix of each subsystem is maximally mixed, and the degree of entanglement is quantified by the von Neumann entropy of the subsystem, which for a Bell state is exactly 1, one ebit, the unit of measurement of quantum correlation.

What do Bell's theorem and the experiments demonstrate?

In 1964 John Bell proved that any local hidden-variable theory imposes a precise limit on the observable correlations, so that in the CHSH formulation the correlation parameter S must satisfy |S| ≤ 2, whereas quantum mechanics predicts up to 2√2. The experiments carried out from the 1970s onwards, progressively closing every experimental loophole, have measured clear violations of the inequality, confirming that nature behaves exactly as quantum theory predicts. For these results Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger received the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Diagram of a Bell test: source of entangled pairs, independent measurements with random angles and CHSH comparison
The measured CHSH value exceeds 2, so local hidden variables are ruled out.

Why did Einstein call it ‘spooky action at a distance’?

In the famous 1935 EPR paper, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen argued that quantum correlations implied either an unacceptable instantaneous action at a distance, the ‘spukhafte Fernwirkung’, or the incompleteness of the theory, which would have to be supplemented by hidden variables. The debate remained philosophical for thirty years, until Bell turned it into an experimental question, and the outcome is now well known, because local hidden variables are ruled out by the data. The methodological lesson remains relevant, since a well-posed conceptual objection, even if wrong, can found an entire field of research, that of quantum information, which is now studied by institutions such as INFN.

What role does quantum entanglement play in computing?

Entanglement is the resource that separates quantum computing from classical computing. A circuit that does not generate entanglement produces factorisable states, which can be efficiently simulated by a conventional computer, as formalised by the Gottesman-Knill theorem and the results on classical simulability. The quantum algorithms that promise real speed-ups, from Shor's factoring to phase estimation, build and manipulate highly entangled states over many qubits. In practical terms, when assessing the power of a processor, the ability to generate and maintain high-quality entanglement across many pairs matters more than the declared number of qubits. A scarcity property known as monogamy also applies, whereby the more two systems are correlated with each other, the less they can be with third parties. It is a structural constraint that circuit designers must manage, because distributing correlations where they are needed is part of the craft.

How is entanglement used in cryptography and teleportation?

The most mature applications are two. Quantum key distribution, in protocols based on entangled pairs such as E91, allows two parties to generate a secret key whose security is guaranteed by physics, since any eavesdropping degrades the correlations and is detected. Quantum teleportation transfers the state of a qubit by consuming an entangled pair and two classical bits, and it is the building block of future quantum networks. Both techniques connect to the topic of post-quantum cryptography, because the first is a physical defence and the second a mathematical one, and serious strategies assess them together. On the industrial side, metropolitan quantum key distribution networks are already operating in several countries, typically over dedicated optical fibre, a sign that the technology is now beyond the laboratory phase, even though costs and distances remain concrete constraints.

How is quantum entanglement studied in emulation?

On real hardware, entanglement can be observed only indirectly, because measurement destroys the state and characterising the correlations requires tomography, which is costly and statistical. In an emulator, such as the EQM platform used by HumanQ, the complete state of the system is instead accessible at any moment, so that one can calculate entanglement entropies, concurrence and fidelity exactly, observe how correlations are built up gate after gate and verify how noise degrades them. For training and applied research it is a decisive advantage, because one sees what on hardware can only be inferred. It is the difference between studying a black box and a transparent one.

Which future applications does quantum entanglement open up?

The most promising directions for the future are mainly three.

  • Quantum networks and the quantum internet. They will distribute entanglement on a geographical scale to connect processors and sensors.
  • Quantum metrology. Entangled states that surpass classical limits of precision in the measurement of time, fields and gravity.
  • Distributed computing. Multiple processors sharing correlations to tackle problems too large for a single one.

Europe is investing in all three lines through the Quantum Flagship. For businesses, the message is that quantum entanglement is leaving the laboratories, and those who understand its logic today will be ready when it becomes infrastructure. Realism nevertheless calls for a final note, because long-distance distribution requires quantum repeaters that are still immature, and serious estimates speak of many years for a global network, whereas metropolitan and laboratory applications are already a measurable reality.

Observe entanglement, not just its effects

With the EQM platform used by HumanQ you can build entangled states, measure their properties exactly and train your team on the fundamentals of quantum computing. Discover quantum emulation, learn more about the qubit or contact the HumanQ team for a tailor-made project.